![moveto anylogic moveto anylogic](https://www.anylogic.com/upload/resize_cache/iblock/4ce/364_209_1/4ce3db7527c117e0d8006ddffafa6761.png)
And there are times when the subject is in front of me and I take the shot only to see later the shutter did not fire.
![moveto anylogic moveto anylogic](https://anylogic.help/tutorials/air-defense/images/Escape_route.png)
Eye detection is useless to me because in a street setting there are eyes everywhere. I assume logically it would focus on the biggest object closest to the lens but that’s not always true. Shooting waist level I have no ideal where it is focusing on. If you look into the EVF and tap the shutter a few times each time you will see the little green rectangles change positions. Multi field is frustrating because it is unpredictable where it will focus. But I find the AF to be hit and miss and too often miss unless the subject is right in front of the camera completely still otherwise the camera will focus elsewhere or won’t even trip. The Q2M should be a dream because of the AF I can shoot at f1.7 to better isolate the subject in a street setting. My other camera for street is the Rolleiflex because I like the up angle look. I don’t use the finder and instead shoot waist level. For street I shoot very close often zone focus with 1M to 3 M in focus and stopped down to at least f5.6 the way I set up my Hasselblad SWC. I had thought the Q2/Q2M was designed to be a camera for street photography but it is better suited for general snap shots I think. The camera is great but maybe not for my shooting style. Six weeks into the Q2M ownership I am considering selling it. At the end of the day the quality of the photograph is not dependent on the camera, it’s dependent on the snapper. Or get just one and use it until it falls apart. And I strongly feel that the best answer is to just get all of them, if one can afford that, and choose the right camera for the moment. What I have come to realize is that all these camera - the M, Q and SL - are their own thing, and none of them supersede or replace the others. Image quality might be a little better on the M10M, dynamic range too, but not dramatically better.ĭo you want a compact, fixed lens 28mm camera with autofocus for 6k, or a rangefinder for 9k with no lens and the ability to use an array of focal lengths? M - no autofocus, more than double the money with an equivalent 28 Summilux. Q2 and the M are cameras, but as different as chalk & cheese in most other regards. If you enjoy shooting with a rangefinder, you know it is it’s own thing.
![moveto anylogic moveto anylogic](https://anylogic.help/tutorials/rail/images/HumpYard.Phase1.Step7.png)
But it’s a rangefinder of course and it doesn’t include any lenses. M10 Mono is a fantastic camera (as well it should be for nine grand). I’ve had an M-P 240 in the past with 21 through 75 lenses. If you shoot in the 28mm to 50mm range almost all the time, is there any logic to moving to a Q2M from the M Monochrom? I am wondering if someone has done this and what the experience has been.